Review Bunker is a review blog where the goal is simply to review everything. Below are the latest reviews. In the About section you can read more about this blog and it's author. Comments are always appreciated, so if you've got something to say, please feel free!
Welcome to Review Bunker!
Archive for the 'Movies' Category
One of the new unrestrained R rated comedies that have been hitting the big screen so often these days, My Best Friend’s Girl (2008) was somewhat amusing, but nothing spectacular. There were many instances in the film that might be considered offensive to some, and funny to others. You will definitely have to go into this movie with a tolerant and open mind in order to find it funny. Dane Cook played his usual suave and charismatic self as ‘Tank,’ but with a twist: he’s a jerk too. Tank’s offensiveness is somewhat funny, but other aspects of his character are much more entertaining. The main story tended to drag on, without a clear path, leaving me bored during the middle portions of the movie. Comfortable in her usual territory, Kate Hudson does a mediocre job portraying the confused girl exploring her wild side. Jason Biggs plays the same character that we see in all of his movies, though Biggs and Cook work well together. Alec Baldwin’s demented and perverted character is played well, and supplies some good ‘oh my god, did they really say that?’ type humor. Alec Baldwin’s minor part is one of many secondary characters that contributed a lot of the humor to the movie - the supporting cast all did a good job. Also, I liked the heavy use of The Cars song, “My Best Friend’s Girl,” but unfortunately, I don’t think they ever let it play all the way through.
If you are a big fan of any of the headliners, you might enjoy this movie. If you are a Dane Cook hater, don’t even consider seeing it. If you don’t have strong feelings about any of the cast, I suggest you wait for the DVD rental from Red Box.
Did you see My Best Friend’s Girl? What did you think? Were you offended? Do you hate Dane Cook?
If you enjoyed this post, Please consider subscribing to my full-post feed, or subscribing to receive my posts by email. Also, please check out my contribute and get reviewed pages. Have anything to say? Please comment!
The third movie in a successful series of heist films, Ocean’s Thirteen did not disappoint - especially when compared to it’s predecessor, Ocean’s Twelve. I loved the fast pace of this film, as well as the “revenge” aspect to the storyline. Much like the other films, “Thirteen” involved a highly complicated plot to score a huge pile of money. The intricacies of the plan were clever and involved, keeping me interested in the progression, and as expected, the movie ends with a few plot twists that make you smile.
Some people might find that “Ocean’s Thirteen” is too predictable, but I feel that it varied enough from the first two in the series to set it apart, and it had many unique facets. Of course, the humor that marked the original two films is again present here - and done quite well. The entire cast of stars did an impressive job of not only working together, but once again playing their unique characters nicely. The ‘headliner’ Al Pacino does an especially great job at playing the ‘bad guy’ prick.
The only aspect of this film that I didn’t like was the showcase of non-existent and unlikely technological gadgets and computer tricks that the team is able to pull out of nowhere to complete their feat. I expected some of this imaginary gadgetry, as in the previous films, but I feel that this time it might have gotten just a bit too ridiculous.
If you were a fan of either of the first two Ocean’s movies, this is definitely a must-see - it is fun, involving, and clever.
What did you think of this movie? Have any movie recommendations for me?
If you enjoyed this post, Please consider subscribing to my full-post feed, or subscribing to receive my posts by email. Also, please check out my contribute and get reviewed pages. Have anything to say? Please comment!
I did not get a chance to see Beowulf at the theatre, despite being recommended the 3D version by multiple people. Fortunately, the DVD was released yesterday, and we rented it from a redbox. Here is my quick review:
Plot: This film stayed surprisingly true to the original epic poem. Of course, there was a lot of modernization, and some semi-major plot changes, but the overall theme was kept, and a lot of the plot works out the same way in the end. I expected a lot more to be different, coming from Hollywood. Either way, this turned out to be a good movie, with an action packed plot that kept me engaged. Having Beowulf yell out his own name at the top of his lungs multiple times seemed to be a bit ridiculous, but I guess it made for good trailer footage.
Acting: This film appears to be animated, but motion capture techniques were used, so it’s hard to know whether physical acting skill can be judged. I can say that the motion capture animation looked very impressive, and it made for a unique and interesting visual style. Also, I can say that the voice-over work was all pretty decent.
Soundtrack: The music in this movie was nothing amazing, but it seemed to fit well with the action, and helped set the mood, as it should.
Overall: Not a bad movie - it kept me involved, and I can imagine how it must have been fun to watch in 3D. I wasn’t amazed by anything in Beowulf, and I wouldn’t necessarily want to see it again, but it was fun to watch once. They could have toned down some of the bad-ass vibes that were a bit overwhelming, and didn’t seem to fit this film like they did so well in 300.
What did you think of this movie? Did you see it in 3D?
If you enjoyed this post, Please consider subscribing to my full-post feed, or subscribing to receive my posts by email. Also, please check out my contribute and get reviewed pages. Have anything to say? Please comment!
Being a manly man, I obviously can’t consent to going to chick flicks very often, and I certainly can’t be caught reviewing them here on Review Bunker, so I have decided to bring in my girlfriend, Crystal, who I accompanied to the romantic comedy, “27 Dresses” last night. She will be here to answer a few review questions about the movie for my audience, so I can remain manly, and you all can hear about this new movie.
Me: “Did you enjoy 27 Dresses? Why?”
Crystal: “Yes. I liked it because it was a happy movie that I can see myself watching multiple times, and even though it was predictable, it was still entertaining.”
Me: “What did you think of the performances of Katherine Heigl, James Marsden, and the other supporting cast members?”
Crystal: “I thought, that even though some of them played quirky and obsessive characters [ex: Katherine Heigl’s Jane], they portrayed real characters that were relatable. I was able to think of people that I know in real life, that were similar to some of the characters in the movie.”
Me: “Were there any actors that you think did a poor job?”
Crystal: “Not really, actually I think one of the things that made it a good movie was that everyone in it acted very well. ”
Me: “What was your favorite part about the plot?”
Crystal: “I enjoy romantic comedies, but not necessarily romance movies, so I appreciated that they didn’t make the movie too mushy.”
Me: “Did you find it funny enough to be considered a comedy?”
Crystal: “Yes, it wasn’t over the top comedy, and instead the humor fit within the plot, and they didn’t seem to be trying to add comedy to the script.”
Me: “Did you ever find yourself bored with the plot, were there any slow parts?”
Crystal: “No, not really, even though I had an idea of what was probably going to happen at the end, it was still entertaining and paced well. I am glad that the plot didn’t get dragged out, going back and forth endlessly.”
Me: “Did the soundtrack stand out at all?”
Crystal: “mmmm… not really.”
Me: “Did you think they portrayed weddings accurately?”
Crystal: “Some of the themed cultural weddings seemed too unrealistic and odd, but at the same time they added humor to the movie.”
Me: “If you had to give the movie a rating between 0 and 5 stars, what would it be?”
Crystal: “I guess maybe a 4.5 because I really liked it, and I am comfortable with the predictability, and I expected it, so I won’t count that against it.”
So, there you go! Crystal, who likes romantic comedies, gives this one a 4.5 out of 5 - so if you are looking for an upbeat, happy, funny, and romantic movie to see, check this one out, and then come back and tell us what you thought.
If you enjoyed this post, Please consider subscribing to my full-post feed, or subscribing to receive my posts by email. Also, please check out my contribute and get reviewed pages. Have anything to say? Please comment!




Before “
Looking beyond the gore, I have to say that I was a bit disappointed in the seemingly shallow way the plot played out - the focus on revenge may have been too great, taking away from other parts of the plot that could have been developed a bit better. Don’t get me wrong, I love revenge stories more than most people, but I couldn’t help but feel that the plot was too singularly focused. Also, I think I am a bit shocked that the “hero” of this movie was so deranged, but I am in the process of trying to accept just how dark some movies can be.
The acting in this film was also very good, and I was happily surprised to see Alan Rickman once again playing an antagonist. Depp’s character didn’t have a whole lot of depth, but he played the “demon” quite well. Helena Bonham-Carter was very convincing, and even all of the more minor roles were acted very well.
Latest Comments